98.5% of Catholic parishes have no AI policy either
Last week we wrote about Protestant pastors: 94% say a church should have guidelines for responsible AI use, and only 4% say their church has a formal policy. The Catholic side of the same story has now been measured — and the gap is wider still.
Pushpay's 2026 State of Church Technology Report, produced with Barna Group, asked Catholic parish leaders whether their parish has an AI use policy. 98.5% said no. Only 1.5% said yes.
That is not because parish leaders do not see the need. 74.6% said a policy is important. Three in four know the parish ought to have one; almost none has written one yet.
The figures come from the takeaways Pushpay shared on 10 November from the 2026 Builders AI Forum in Rome (5–6 November), held at the Pontifical Gregorian University. The forum's line is the one worth keeping: artificial intelligence must never replace authentic human connection. Tools should reduce administrative burdens so staff and clergy have more time for pastoral presence and community care. As Pushpay's Gerardo Butalid put it in Rome: “Technology is a tool, not the mission itself. When AI handles heavy administrative tasks, it creates space for parish staff to focus on what only humans can do.”
The forum's other takeaways point the same way: ethical discernment must guide adoption, with human dignity, data privacy and safety put ahead of adopting a tool simply because the capability exists; and the Church should help shape emerging technology rather than passively react to it, with leaders, theologians, ethicists and technologists working together rather than in silos.
None of that is an argument against using AI in a parish. It is an argument for agreeing, in writing, how the parish will use it — before a volunteer pastes a prayer list, a child's details, or a giving record into a chatbot.
So here is the weekend version. It is the whole point of the template we published last week:
- Friday evening, 30 minutes: name one person to own the policy, and one person to review it with them.
- Saturday morning, 90 minutes: fill in the template together — the approved-uses list, the never-enter list, the giving-data rule, and a review date.
- Sunday, one minute: tell the congregation, in a single sentence, what you agreed.
That is how a parish joins the 1.5%. The template is copy-ready, with the blanks to fill in and nothing to buy: A church AI policy in a weekend →
Sources: Pushpay, “Pushpay Shares Key Takeaways for Catholic Parishes From the 2026 Builders AI Forum,” GlobeNewswire, 10 November 2026: 98.5% of Catholic parish leaders surveyed said their parish has no AI use policy, while 74.6% said one is important; the forum was held 5–6 November 2026 in Rome at the Pontifical Gregorian University; the Butalid quotation and the takeaways on human connection, ethical discernment, human dignity, data privacy and collaboration are as printed there. These are the Catholic-parish subset of Pushpay/Barna's State of Church Technology 2026 survey (1,306 US church leaders overall: 60% use AI at least monthly, 64% say a policy matters, 5% have one) — so the 1.5% here and the 5% overall are different cuts of one survey, not two surveys disagreeing, and they must not be presented as one number. Two honest limits: the release does not state the size of the Catholic subset, so no subsample number is given; and Pushpay is a vendor in this space — the release also describes its ParishStaq AI features — so this post takes its survey figures and forum takeaways and endorses no Pushpay product.
Related reading: A church AI policy in a weekend — the copy-ready template this post points to; 94% of pastors say churches need AI guidance. Only 4% have a policy. — the Protestant-pastor figures from the same gap, kept strictly separate (Barna Faith & AI with Gloo, 442 US Protestant pastors); and the Responsible AI guide — the principles behind it.